In D:\Research\TRUCE-Rec, act as a top-conference reviewer. Review docs/PROJE…

Metadata

  • Stable ID: codex-user-prompt:c0aa0dfebd31cf22
  • Source kind: codex-session-user
  • Category: research-workflow
  • Timestamp: 2026-05-09T00:46:32.902Z
  • Semantic hash: c0aa0dfebd31cf22fd733ba86aa70cb93ee06d0cd4bf213e2eabbfb859c865a7
  • Public handling: selected full-text prompt with secret filtering.

Prompt Text

In D:\Research\TRUCE-Rec, act as a top-conference reviewer. Review docs/PROJECT_MEMORY.md, docs/submission_roadmap.md, docs/RESEARCH_IDEA.md, docs/qwen3_lora_controlled_baselines.md, src/llm4rec/methods/ours_framework.py, src/llm4rec/methods/cu_gr.py, src/llm4rec/methods/preference_fusion.py. Judge whether Ours is currently deep/novel/complex enough versus the official Qwen3-LoRA baselines. Identify missing method design pieces and exact documentation/milestone text that should be added. Emphasize the user's new requirement: observation stage should cover Beauty full + other three 10k-user domains, use Qwen3-8B base calls and Qwen3-8B+four senior-recommended baselines to verify the same phenomena; formal baseline/method phase must retrain/evaluate under identical configs; literature/project reading is allowed only as inspiration, not stitching/copying. Do not edit files. Return concise actionable recommendations.

Reuse Notes

  • EXTRACTED: This is a selected Codex prompt or automation prompt from the local Codex corpus.
  • INFERRED: Future agents can reuse its structure, constraints, and acceptance criteria when creating similar Codex workflows.