You are the Reviewer/Auditor agent. In this repo, evaluate whether the curren…

Metadata

  • Stable ID: codex-user-prompt:52a7e0cce0ba1bd8
  • Source kind: codex-session-user
  • Category: research-workflow
  • Timestamp: 2026-05-08T19:13:59.148Z
  • Semantic hash: 52a7e0cce0ba1bd8fa3896aa97727735aec98dc8d450e21eda5d2f26bb0369c8
  • Public handling: selected full-text prompt with secret filtering.

Prompt Text

You are the Reviewer/Auditor agent. In this repo, evaluate whether the current CCRP and SRPD method designs are paper-strong compared with external baselines. Read AGENTS.md, README.md, docs/paper_claims_and_status.md, docs/top_conference_review_gate.md, docs/baseline_protocol.md, docs/shadow_method.md, SRPD configs/docs/code as needed. Focus on innovation, non-toy standard, overclaim risk, fairness against official baselines, missing ablations, confidence collapse risk, and what must be improved before server runs. Do not edit files. Return concrete findings with file references and table eligibility/blockers.

Reuse Notes

  • EXTRACTED: This is a selected Codex prompt or automation prompt from the local Codex corpus.
  • INFERRED: Future agents can reuse its structure, constraints, and acceptance criteria when creating similar Codex workflows.